> Right, I just objected the word 'booted'. It was not done without a strong cause in each case.
>
>I strongly disagree.
>
>JVP's ban in Sept '04 was totally without merit. I've seen people get away with comments that are equal or worse than the five posts that got John banned. And I've come across some recent information that 'may' have been incidental to the ban, which makes the decision all the more ridiculous. And I hope the UT is listening...

I actually didn't follow the discussions / arguments, but as I understood at some point they degenerated and therefore there was no other choice as to ban both participants. I think you gave a reference recently to these messages.