> Right, I just objected the word 'booted'. It was not done without a strong cause in each case.
>
>I strongly disagree.
>
>JVP's ban in Sept '04 was totally without merit. I've seen people get away with comments that are equal or worse than the five posts that got John banned. And I've come across some recent information that 'may' have been incidental to the ban, which makes the decision all the more ridiculous. And I hope the UT is listening...

Kevin - I usually stay out of discussions about JVP, but I think it's important to point out that by the time he was banned for good, there was a lot of history of his inciting trouble.

Tamar