>>That is a very skewed perception of the events up there. It was mainly an attack from JVP with very little actual fact to VFP and motivate people to look into VB and ADO. We all know how that turned out. I've personally technically challenged him on many, many occasions, but he choose to revert to slam dunks (Do you have real life experience?) of technical arguments that did not hold much water. How could anyone up here take somebody seriously saying that ADO.NET in .NET1.0 is justs as good database engine as the build in VFP engine?? Like others here JVP seldomly choose to argue on pure technical arguments, but rather on personal believes, opinion or preferences. This is not bad per se, unless pushing this through someone else his throat. JVP had a big mouth and that was the reason he was booted... Though entertaining, his departure returned the peace up here.
>
>You've never argued on technical merit, you argue on your beliefs and what you think is right (even admitting you never used the products in question), regardless of the actual facts. The recent stored procedures arguments are a case in point. So your argument here again is specious.

LMAO, just review my answer to kevins SP thread.