>Yeah, I think we're talking the general shape of the hull which for some of the nuclear types is "fairly" accurate, like say a Typhoon class boomer. LOL. Probably depends on the variety of bread used also. But as a descriptor it's quite good, since saying you're gonna have a "sub" for lunch clearly identifies the article of consumption. :-)

Well it looked more like a sub under construction at a navy yard to me :-)

>
>Russia is our (political) friend, why should it tremble? :-)

T'ain't ours at the moment. It's like being back in the 60s/70s, with tit-for-tat expulsions starting again.

>
>Bill
>
>>
>>Thanks Bill. Yes, you summed it up. Now, if you hams think that a submarine resembles anything like the sandwich in the picture then, well, why should Russia tremble. :-)
>>
>>>
>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub_sandwich
>>>
>>>>
>>>>And which part is the conning tower?
>>>>
>>>>So they think a baguette-shaped sandwich resembles a submarine, so they remove the meaning once more and call the shop "Subway" (as in underwater channels)?
>>>>
>>>>You sure, cos that allusion is lame?