Wow, yes we do have completely differing views on the purpose and user of a twit filter. Regardless, it is probably never personal. Even so, it is unhealthy and unnatural to take is personally.
>>Nonsense. Twitting a person is simply
not reading their messages. It is nothing other than a filter. The person generally does not even know they have been twitted so how could it cause any pain or suffering? It is not any response at all - unlike negative responses or comments. If it causes any pain or suffering, then that person has an unrealistic and unhealthy view of online participation and should seek counseling.
>>
>
>We have different views on the topic. IMO, the twit means that someone dislike the other person and doesn't want to read the other person messages. Simple as that. But would the twitted person will try to figure out the reasons for dislike? I would guess it's quite natural.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"