Mike Yearwood
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
General information
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Environment versions
Network:
Windows 2000 Server
>>Thanks Borislav, that's it.
>>The decision to use non-production indexes was made before my time...
>>I think one reason was to speed up appends by disabling indexing.
>>
>>Howard
>
>WHAT?
>How many APPEND's you have in the application?
>If you change APPEND BLANK->REPLACE to INSERT INTO the index will be updated when the INSERT finish its job.
>Even if you didn't use nonstructural compound index you have to REINDEX after the APPEND, so no speed gain.
No, as long as index is open before APPEND it is updated.
>If that INDEX is opened again no speed gain because it is reindexed automaticaly.
>If you use structural compound index your life will be much easier.
>No need to care if the index is updated -> it is.
>It will be used for Optimization (I am not sure about if nonstructural compound index could be used for this, because I never used them).
They are, but the chance of leaving one closed while adding records is too dangerous for my liking.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only