I disagree with your disagreement, Craig.< s > I would say that some, effectively, could have been adapted from VFP, but really, the C Omega project was earlier and it wasn't related with Fox at all... John aknowledge that while he did see the Zorro project, he can't be sure this was the seed for LINQ. But C Omega was mostly identical to the current implementation prior to be passed onto the C# and VB teams.

>I disagree. Much of what LINQ does came out of work done by the Fox team on how to access data, not objects, in .Net.
>
>>This means that, if you are using Sql Server, Linq to Sql is currently useless. But Linq in general is fully available. IMO, it is a mistake to see Linq exclusively as a means to access data from databases. Linq was born on the language itself (C# and VB) and its main intent is to access collections of data in memory. Its variations (Linq to Xml, Linq to Sql, Linq to Entities, etc) are actually consequences of the power of Linq.

Regards,