>You know, I started writing it using m.Successful and then setting that to .F. if something bad happend. After the code was done I would check the value and do something based on that, but I thought it was too old-style and wanted to find something more contemporary. Guess I'll just end up doing it the way I've done it for 15 years. I just assumed there must be a better way now.
>
>

At my previous job I developed a class called BusinessProcess which is based on the session class. I then based all my otherwise to be procedural code on this class and coded them as class. It had several advantages and ease of developing a new process.