Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Anyone still use 'Set Procedure To'?
Message
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
Environment versions
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 8 SP1
OS:
Windows XP SP2
Database:
Visual FoxPro
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01247248
Message ID:
01247332
Views:
30
>>it's faster to instantiate them
>
>Hi Christof,
>
>Ain't that the truth! It's one of the reasons that Bo Durban is working on converting the GDIPlusX library to a set of PRGs instead of VCXs. Not only is the instantiation an order of magnitude faster the size of the application is much smaller when compiled with a PRG. Also, PRG's allow a developer to optionally exclude certain portions (classes, procedures,etc.) of the PRG using compiler directives, whereas with a VCX you can't even exclude certain classes from the build... it's either build the entire VCX in or nothing. This might not seem like much, but with huge library or procedural files where only a portion of the code is needed it can significantly reduce the app's footprint.
>
>Anyways, good point Christof

Thanks for the info.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.


My Blog
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform