>>Michel, great news, although not unexpected by me.
>>
>>I understand that this implies lower costs for the non-residents. Does that also imply a reimbursement? Personally, I'm not interested in such reimbursement. Suppose you plan to pay back, you can keep my share. Perhaps your bookkeeper can put that money in a 'fund' that has been used for the costs you made in this case.
>
>Thanks for the feedback
>
>The only reimbursment expected would probably be the amounts I started to pay for the requested uncollected tax of 2004. As for the pay back, in regards to the tax charged since 2005, this is requested tax charged by the government and all of it has been reimbursed to them as expected. So, I do not know how someone could pay back that tax to the non residents. In regards to that, Level Extreme has also dropped the subscription rate by almost 40% to cover that, at least the 15% increase, (how it was seen by many). So, I think whatever could have been done has been done.

Probably 'reimbursement' is not well enough understood by me. For my understanding, could you be so kind to clarify:

Do you get all the paid taxes (regarding the non-residents) back?
If that's the case, are you formally obliged by the government to pay back to all non-residents who paid those taxes?
If that's the case, are you obliged to actively pay back or should these customers fill in a request?
If you're not obliged to pay back, are non-residents free to fill in a request?

Let me restate: Personally I don't want that money back because you made a lot of costs.