When someone writes of a politician's legacy, I personally would expect a mention of their political and legislative accomplishments, ALONG WITH the obligatory reporting of the number of people they had to kill to silence their detractors. Everyone knows the Clintons killed Foster in HJC's apt, rolled his body up in a rug, and dumped it in Marcy park. But where is the reporting on the actual governing that would lend 'balance' to the 'body count' reporting? ;)

>Those links strike me as opinionated right wing spin.
>
[snip]
>
>>Hmmmm, let's take a look at his legacy:
>>
>>http://www.clintonmemoriallibrary.com/clintoncrime.html
>>http://prorev.com/legacy.htm
>>http://prorev.com/wwindex.htm
>>http://www.ornery.org/essays/2001-01-26-1.html
>>http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/resources/1998/lewinsky/
>>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=13929
>>
>>
>>>Let's see if I have you right - Clinton lied about an affair that had absolutly nothing to do with
>>>the constitution, national security, or the American people, and he deserves impeachment and jail time.
>>>
>>>On the other hand, Reagan sold weapons in the Iran/Contral thing, which by the way IS against the US constitution, and he did no time.
>>>
>>>Ya, that makes sense.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>It seems each generation gets worse as it relates to a plethora of subjects, but expecially >>manners. ?Ronald Reagan, it has been reported, wouldn't even enter the Oval Office without wearing >>his suit coat. He held the office is high esteem, and he was from the "greatest generation."
>>>>>
>>>>>Reagan should have been wearing a jail suit.
>>>>
>>>>You misspelled Clinton!