>>Let's see if I have you right - Clinton lied about an affair that had absolutly nothing to do with
>>the constitution, national security, or the American people, and he deserves impeachment and jail time.
>>
>>On the other hand, Reagan sold weapons in the Iran/Contral thing, which by the way IS against the US constitution, and he did no time.
>>
>>Ya, that makes sense.
>
>Hmm, you have proof that Reagan sold weapons to anyone? I'd like to see it.
>
>the clintons gave away technology to communist china and north korea. they also took money by the trainload from chinese. he lied about not having sex with "that woman", which was perjury. he could have saved the country a lot of money and agony by just admitting it and moving on. clinton = caca


Anyone who thinks Reagan didn't approve the sale of weapons is a fool.

And as far as Clinton, the Republic controlled congress approved the sale of technology to China. Fancy
that - someone else beside Clinton was involved. Maybe check your facts before you Cliton-bash?

And as far as saving the country money - Clinton was under (expensive) investigation long before the
Monica thing broke. It was a waste of taxpayer money on some republican-lead which hunt. Again, check your facts.

Your hatred of Clinton is entirely unfounded. The man did nothing legally wrong.