>>>>Just had a thought. What about using AddObject (or something like that) in the oxServer that creates the oHandler object, instead of passing it in? Or is that like having two mirrors facing one another?
>>>>
>>>You mean something like

>>>oxHandler = CREATEOBJECT( "EMPS_Handler_Medinotes_Class" )
>>>oxServer = CREATEOBJECT( "EMPS_Server_Class",m.Port,oxHandler )
>>>oxServer.oxHandler.addproperty('oxServer',this)

>>>
>>>I don't know if this is "proper" design, but you would wind up with each object having a reference to the other.
>>
>>No, just have:
>>
>>oxServer = CREATEOBJECT( "EMPS_Server_Class",m.Port)
>>
>>Then inside the oxServer definition, have this:
>>
>>oxHandler = CREATEOBJECT( "EMPS_Handler_Medinotes_Class" )
>>
>>Wouldn't that create the object oxHandler as a child of oxServer? Same thing I'm doing when I pass it, but now it will have the proper parent relationship because it was created with oxServer instead of before.
>
>No unless you do it like
>
>this.oxHandler = CREATEOBJECT( "EMPS_Handler_Medinotes_Class" )

Ok, syntax aside, that would be a logical approach to this, right?