>>>>>>>...
>>>>>>>>>>>Next question is probably going to have to do with angels and needle tips...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>My best guess is that Angels don't use needles. They're naturally high.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>lol. The ancient philosopher didn't come to think of that, for some reason.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I guess even philosophers Kant think of everything.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>With puns like that you're just Sartre Confuscian de Mann, and you'll get no Marx from me!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Locke here now. You Nietzsche know he understands Fuller than you realise. Anyway, D'Israeli has Bacon too Mach.
>>>>>
>>>>>You always try and Goethe me into a Fichte, Buddha Comte be Darwin into it
>>>>
>>>>Hello? Foucault? You're Thoreauly Schelling me. You Plato our Tzu loves - words and puns. I helps to Schopenhauer wits, but plays Hobbes with my time. Camus Zeno end to this?
>>>
>>>Hess, Wright, it keeps you Jung at Hart, Bohr don't be Diogenes issue. Let's not put Descartes before the Herz.
>>
>>Sorry for the long delay, but I had no Joyce. Had to Gödel the boss something, and Turing every question Ast into a Popper foofaraw is his specialty. Watts worse, Hegel be Ch'ung gum with open mouth while Maiminides that I put forward. Well Hume I to complain, and Dewey care anyway?
>
>LOL
>
>Thales a Tolstoy! Hannay excuse! Haym Sorley Buddha Duhem Bayle Evola Dias. It Mosca Tai-chen Hughes Hall Knight or Moore (Weyl, it Tucker Hughes Longinus) to Comte Philo Dias Lotze. Hughes Tindal Haym daft?

Okay, you win. I can only figure out about half of that.
That's a tall story? Thales for that's?
Any excuse Ok. good one.
I'm sorry, but I don't believe all of that? Geez Terry. Worse and worse.
It musta taken you all night or more (well, it took you longer than us to come... ??? Philo Dias Lotze ???
You think I'm daft?? Tindal for think ???

And no, I didn't get a chance to think about it yesterday later in the afternoon at all. So I put it together at home during dinner and typed it this morning at work.