>>>>>>>>>>...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Next question is probably going to have to do with angels and needle tips...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>My best guess is that Angels don't use needles. They're naturally high.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>lol. The ancient philosopher didn't come to think of that, for some reason.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>I guess even philosophers Kant think of everything.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>With puns like that you're just Sartre Confuscian de Mann, and you'll get no Marx from me!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Locke here now. You Nietzsche know he understands Fuller than you realise. Anyway, D'Israeli has Bacon too Mach.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You always try and Goethe me into a Fichte, Buddha Comte be Darwin into it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hello? Foucault? You're Thoreauly Schelling me. You Plato our Tzu loves - words and puns. I helps to Schopenhauer wits, but plays Hobbes with my time. Camus Zeno end to this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hess, Wright, it keeps you Jung at Hart, Bohr don't be Diogenes issue. Let's not put Descartes before the Herz.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sorry for the long delay, but I had no Joyce. Had to Gödel the boss something, and Turing every question Ast into a Popper foofaraw is his specialty. Watts worse, Hegel be Ch'ung gum with open mouth while Maiminides that I put forward. Well Hume I to complain, and Dewey care anyway?
>>>>
>>>>LOL
>>>>
>>>>Thales a Tolstoy! Hannay excuse! Haym Sorley Buddha Duhem Bayle Evola Dias. It Mosca Tai-chen Hughes Hall Knight or Moore (Weyl, it Tucker Hughes Longinus) to Comte Philo Dias Lotze. Hughes Tindal Haym daft?
>>>
>>>Okay, you win. I can only figure out about half of that.
>>>That's a tall story? Thales for that's?
>>>Any excuse Ok. good one.
>>>I'm sorry, but I don't believe all of that? Geez Terry. Worse and worse.
>>
>>I'm sorry, but I don't believe all of this.
>>
>>What's "worse" about that?!! Well if you're Günther insult me! ... I didn't get all yours, but I gave you the Bennet Fichte of the doubt.
>
>But Duhem for don't?

as in pronounced "doo-mm" - if you say it fast enough with the other words it works - I reckon. :-)

>Thales for that's? Tindal for 'think'? Shouldn't there be some degree of homonymicity (likely a made up word) to the pun?

homonymicity - scmhomonymicity:

I got Gödel though, being German, it should be pronounced like "girdell"

BTW - homonymism?????

>
>What part of mine didn't you get. Maybe I'm doing the same as I'm accusing you of doing without realising it.

Maiminides? - my-im-in-eedeez?

>
>>>It musta taken you all night or more (well, it took you longer than us to come... ??? Philo Dias Lotze ???
>>
>>It musta taken you all night or more (well, it took you longer enough)
>
>>>to Comte Philo Dias Lotze
>>
>>to compile this lot.
>
>Ok, I guess I see that now that you've pointed it out. I'd not have got it on my own. It's not that it's bad, but 'compile' was just not the sort of word I was expecting, I guess.
>
>>>You think I'm daft?? Tindal for think ???
>
>>>And no, I didn't get a chance to think about it yesterday later in the afternoon at all. So I put it together at home during dinner and typed it this morning at work.
>>
>>What the 'kinell s a "foofaraw"?
>
>It's a 'fuss'. According to Webster, a disturbance or to-do over a trifle. That's my boss. Unfortunately, he's the kind of guy who likes to find issues one at a time and call me separately on each one. It means I'm on the phone to him or in his office a dozen times a day for every trivial little thing he comes up with (as I said, one triviality at a time).