Yes and No. To many, including me, the main issue with this (as well as the guy from Fl.), is not the escapade itself.
But the self-righteousness of a guy(s) who a)Belong to a political party that bases a hugh part of it's recent success to defining the very acts they are accussed of comitting as immoral b)In almost all of the recent cases involving repubs, the individual personally sponsered anti-gay legislation.
>
Yeah, maybe, but let's face it. He displayed incredible stupidity and a horrible lack of judgement. I mean, an airport washroom for crying out loud? Do we really need people with such an acute inability to think coherently sitting in the U.S. senate, creating rules for other people to live by? Personally, I'm agin it. >
>One could argue that Clinton showed comparably bad judgement with his "inappropriate relationship" and subsequent lack of accountability.
>
>Don't get me wrong, what Craig did was just plain idiotic. But I'll bet some of the same people who are citing this as an example of Republican duplicity, are also the ones who criticized those who went after Bill Clinton. Bottom line, sexual escapades aren't limited to one political party.
(On an infant's shirt): Already smarter than Bush