>>>>>>>>>>>>...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Next question is probably going to have to do with angels and needle tips...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>My best guess is that Angels don't use needles. They're naturally high.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>lol. The ancient philosopher didn't come to think of that, for some reason.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>I guess even philosophers Kant think of everything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>With puns like that you're just Sartre Confuscian de Mann, and you'll get no Marx from me!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Locke here now. You Nietzsche know he understands Fuller than you realise. Anyway, D'Israeli has Bacon too Mach.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>You always try and Goethe me into a Fichte, Buddha Comte be Darwin into it
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Hello? Foucault? You're Thoreauly Schelling me. You Plato our Tzu loves - words and puns. I helps to Schopenhauer wits, but plays Hobbes with my time. Camus Zeno end to this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hess, Wright, it keeps you Jung at Hart, Bohr don't be Diogenes issue. Let's not put Descartes before the Herz.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Sorry for the long delay, but I had no Joyce. Had to Gödel the boss something, and Turing every question Ast into a Popper foofaraw is his specialty. Watts worse, Hegel be Ch'ung gum with open mouth while Maiminides that I put forward. Well Hume I to complain, and Dewey care anyway?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thales a Tolstoy! Hannay excuse! Haym Sorley Buddha Duhem Bayle Evola Dias. It Mosca Tai-chen Hughes Hall Knight or Moore (Weyl, it Tucker Hughes Longinus) to Comte Philo Dias Lotze. Hughes Tindal Haym daft?
>>>>>
>>>>>Okay, you win. I can only figure out about half of that.
>>>>>That's a tall story? Thales for that's?
>>>>>Any excuse Ok. good one.
>>>>>I'm sorry, but I don't believe all of that? Geez Terry. Worse and worse.
>>>>
>>>>I'm sorry, but I don't believe all of this.
>>>>
>>>>What's "worse" about that?!! Well if you're Günther insult me! ... I didn't get all yours, but I gave you the Bennet Fichte of the doubt.
>>>
>>>But Duhem for don't?
>>
>>as in pronounced "doo-mm" - if you say it fast enough with the other words it works - I reckon. :-)
>
>Hmmm.... Over here we'd say it more like 'doo-em' probably.
>
>>
>>>Thales for that's? Tindal for 'think'? Shouldn't there be some degree of homonymicity (likely a made up word) to the pun?
>>
>>homonymicity - scmhomonymicity:
>>
>>I got Gödel though, being German, it should be pronounced like "girdell"
>
>I know, but to the great unwashed... ;)
>
>>
>>BTW - homonymism?????
>
>Probably also a made up word.
>
>>
>>>
>>>What part of mine didn't you get. Maybe I'm doing the same as I'm accusing you of doing without realising it.
>>
>>Maiminides? - my-im-in-eedeez?
>
>Well, I pronounce it like "Maimin' idees" (actually with the accent on the 'i' before the 'd', but I won't tell anybody if you don't).

So "My main ideas"?

Hegel be Ch'ung gum with open mouth while Maiminides that I put forward

"He'll be chewing gum with ... while my main ideas that I put forward..." - is not a complete sentence - hence my Confuscian.
...