>>
Yeah, maybe, but let's face it. He displayed incredible stupidity and a horrible lack of judgement. I mean, an airport washroom for crying out loud? Do we really need people with such an acute inability to think coherently sitting in the U.S. senate, creating rules for other people to live by? Personally, I'm agin it. >>
>>One could argue that Clinton showed comparably bad judgement with his "inappropriate relationship" and subsequent lack of accountability.
>>
>>Don't get me wrong, what Craig did was just plain idiotic. But I'll bet some of the same people who are citing this as an example of Republican duplicity, are also the ones who criticized those who went after Bill Clinton. Bottom line, sexual escapades aren't limited to one political party.
>
>Sure. I agree. But there is one difference. Clinton may have had at least some small reason to think that his office was secure. Still stupid, I agree, but a public toilet? Geez. That transcends stupidity.
And at least he transgressed with a woman! I don't think he'd have been so teflon-coated if it had been MAN-ICHOR with LOU INSKY
- Whoever said that women are the weaker sex never tried to wrest the bedclothes off one in the middle of the night
- Worry is the interest you pay, in advance, for a loan that you may never need to take out.