Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Greed At Its Best
Message
De
04/09/2007 09:48:33
 
 
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
01251725
Message ID:
01252170
Vues:
20
True, but you get more winnings in the longrun if you take the payments. The total prize is larger. If you take the lump sum, I think it is only somewhere from 40-60% of the advertised jackpot. If you take the payments, then you get the full amount over time. You pay taxes on the total amount you receive though like you stated. Now there are companies that will 'buy' your winnings. You take the payments (to receive the full advertised winning amount) and sign over your rights to a company who then gives you a check for some amount between the cash prize and payments prize. For example, if the jackpot is 5 million over 40 years and the cash prize is 2.5 million up front, the company will pay you 3.5 million and then they get the difference but have to take it overtime for 40 years as you would.



>No, you pay taxes on the payout. It doesn't matter whether it's one lump sum payment or a series of annual ones.
>
>
>>Isn't it that you pay close to 50% in taxes?
>>
>>>One possibility is that there was another winning ticket.
>>>
>>>Another possibility is that the winning amount is described as the total amount of a series of payments (usually over 20-30 years depending on the particular lottery). You have an option on getting either the annuity or cash value.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform