>>>>>>This must be quickest example of thread-drift I've ever seen.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just in case it isn't clear, that was a reply to my comment about "the-browser-that-must-not-be-named". This is an allusion to Lord Voldemort, in the Harry Potter series.
>>>>
>>>>Sure, but this started as a question about a memory error. Within 2 (maybe only 1) posts we are talking about something else entirely.
>>>
>>>Because that's where we can contribute. The innards of IE7... does anyone out there know how deep does the rabbit hole go? Specially with all the security patches, relevant code entangled with the OS (again, why is my Quick Launch directory stored under "c:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Application Data\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Quick Launch\"?), the very speed of the thread drift should have told you you're alone on this one. Or maybe not, maybe some viruses are keeping you company.
>>
>>"Contribute" being a very subjective term with regards to finding help with a topic, but I digress... <g>
>
>I meant we could only contribute to thread drift. Obviously nobody has a clue as to why your unmentionable acts out.

Yeah, I often wondered why people respond to a technical thread, at least the first reponders, if there is nothing related to contribute. Must be some political message, or news item or something that would fit the bill better.