>>>Dragan,
>>>
>>>I meant "international" in the pop culture sense of the world in which spoiled kids imagine that happiness is a jet-set lifestyle where you pop across to "international city x" or "international city y" on a whim. ;-)
>>
>>Then they are sadly mistaken. Can't remember a single city that's on no man's land, or that has the border zig-zagging through it. Berlin once had it, but that was an intranational border.
>
>Some might argue Brussels, esspecially with the current events in belgium (Unable to form an administration because of not being able to unite the french lingual (walen) and the vlemish part).

Well, splitting up European countries got so much support from the West, to the extent that the people there got the idea that this must be a very good thing, and that they may get the same kind of support from themselves.