Actually that was the answer. It seem I should make that a bit clearly...

I said CNN think about him as an evil. Yes I emphasized that's wrong. But you supposed that makes "metin think about castro, he's an angel.". How can you do that?

All leaders make mistakes. Sure Castro did a lot... But I think so he is better from Bush. CNN and National Geographics just slander him.

I think so he made good job in spite of under USA's hard pressure...

>No, not at all. I'm questioning your statement Metin. You still haven't answered me. You complained because CNN suggests (they never stated this so it must be insinuated in your mind) that Castro is evil (I won't argue that assumption by CNN at all). He may have done some good for his country, but that doesn't negate the rest. Your original statement suggested that, in contradiction to CNN to what you perceived as CNN's position, you do not see him as evil. I am questioning THAT and you have not responded. I am asking whether or not you see anything wrong with Castro's leadership over the years? That was my question Metin. You were the first to contradict, not me. Now all you are doing is throwing questions back at me Metin without answering anything at all to support your original position. I will continue this discussion if you actually answer my question with facts, not more questions which prove or support nothing. Then after that you can argue the
>merits of his leadership.
>
>
>>You see just black and white? Everything just bad or good?
>>
>>>You don't see anything wrong with Fidel Castro's leadership over the years?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Tracy, in according of CNN and even National Geographics, Fidel Castro is an Evil (That's not their word that's what they mean)...
>>>>Throw these glasses... :)