Yeah. I've been making a lot of typos lately! :o)
>You mean IEDs, right? ;-) Unless the insurgents are using Visual Studio and whatnot....
>
>
>>Because we are fighting insurgents who are using suicide bombers and roadside IDEs and we are not indiscriminately bombing the cities to target the terrorists. No escalation. There's enough collateral damage already (using the military term).
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
Coulda sworn the word "nuke" was originally used. It's only since there's been so much adverse reaction that he may have denied it. >>>>
>>>>I'm not denying anything.
>>>>
>>>>Would we have been justified? Hell, yes. But given that we could take out their military in a matter of days or a week at the most, conventional would be enough.
>>>
>>>I'm somewhat on your side here, but are you sure of that? It's been a long time so far in Iraq...
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"