Sure. We members of the club of have-nukes are a closed shop and no-one else is allowed to join. So any other country that tries to get one we should nuke - to show them the dangers of their having them. I know you're not condoning this but you see the warped logic behind Goffism?

>We only know for sure that those countries who are allowed to have nukes have them. There others which may have them - North Korea and Iran are in that list but we all know there are more. It is a fear we all have to live with.
>
>
>
>>>>>What you advocated, and what so many people have jumped on you for, is killing entire populations, 99.99% of whom have done nothing to us.
>>>>>
>>>>>What I am advocating is stopping state-sponsored terrorism. Is the inevitable result still tragic? Absolutely. It was tragic in 1945 and is still tragic today. But as I said, there is something far worse than fallout from bombing Tehran...allowing Tehran to develop a bomb. That is what much of this boils down to.
>>>>
>>>>God! wouldn't it be terrible if Tehran developed a nuclear bomb - and then used it to bomb a city and kill untold 1000s of innocent people!
>>>>
>>>>A good solution to that would be bomb a city and kill untold 1000s of innocent people.
>>>
>>>I'm certainly not for intentionly killing the innocent people, but if it came to this and I was backed into a corner of a no-win situation, better their 1000 then my 1000.
>>
>>And there but for the grace of God are you living in the USA and not N. Korea (and therefore able to make that pre-emptive decision), and praying that KG's gaze doesn't turn your way!