Like I say, he wasn't just asking for it he was gagging for it! He was the verbal equivalent of the old streakers we usaed to get in the 70s at sports fixtures.

>Same here. I'm suspicous, but they clearly had to handcuff him because he was resisting being removed from the premises. I never heard anything close to him being arrested (except from him of course). It is just too difficult to tell however I must be in the minority because they clearly warned him and 5 of them could not pull him outside so out came the taser. He was loud and resisting clearly and it appeared to me that he was clearly inciting them to do something. He started off fighting back and resisting when they were only asking him to leave the premises initially but he was asking why he was being arrested.
>
>
>
>
>>>>>>>Except when you ask a critical question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://www.telegraaf.nl/buitenland/71161941/Stroomstoot_na__verkeerde__vraag.html?p=12,1
>>>>>>>Click the video play button
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>makes you wonder what ever happened to 'free speech'
>>>>>>
>>>>>>They're introducing the taser here now. Its supposed to be a last resort for violent offenders. I hope they won't get away with using it like that.
>>>>>
>>>>>I would have tased the b*****d for his annoying voice alone! :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>If he'd asked the goddamn question instead of droning on he might have had his say.
>>>>
>>>>Agreed he was a windbag not asking a genuine question but they should have been able to deal with him without the taser.
>>>
>>>Note that he was tased when he was already on the ground, handcuffed. And I didn't hear a single word spoken by the cops.
>>>
>>
>>He was half handcuffed from what I could see and hear. I heard the cops telling him to roll over onto his stomach and to cooperate, or be tased.
>>
>>>Aren't at least universities supposed to be off-limits and independent? Damn, even Tito didn't send cops into the university when it was under student blockade in 1968.
>>>
>>>Now about this guy Castro...