>>It technically means what can be known or observed to a network of many many minds.
>
>>Objective is not the lack of a subject; it is the inclusion of all subjects.
>
>Ok, here I think we are having a bit of a disconnect. What I mean by objectivity is clearly not what you think of as objectivity.


From the wikipedia:

Objectivity in science is the property of scientific measurement that can be tested independent from the individual scientist (the subject) who proposes them. It is intimately related to the aim of verifiability and reproducibility. To be properly considered objective, the results of measurement must be communicated from person-to-person, and then demonstrated for third parties, as an advance in understanding of the objective world. Such demonstrable knowledge would ordinarily confer demonstrable powers of prediction or technological construction.


Knowledge is objective if you, and I, and everyone else can look at something, and find agreement on it.


What you think of "objectively" is effectively someone who observes absolute reality as it actually is, without a mind.

You would need to be the programmer of absolute reality.

God is the only objective observer by your definition.

Like I said, that's not what objectivity means in science.

Objective knowledge is the relative truth of the network of all minds.