Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
FOPEN() fail faster?
Message
De
27/09/2007 12:53:20
Mike Yearwood
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
 
 
À
27/09/2007 12:25:29
Dragan Nedeljkovich (En ligne)
Now officially retired
Zrenjanin, Serbia
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
Versions des environnements
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9 SP1
Divers
Thread ID:
01255774
Message ID:
01257248
Vues:
28
>>
>>OK. Just a reminder - it's windows XP. fsize did the same thing as ADIR. Trying FOPEN next, but switched from that originally because of a suspected deadlock situation.
>
>Note that I said "fopen() read only" - and that'd be unbuffered as well. Since you aren't exactly reading anything, just doing a ?fseek(h, 0, 2) shouldn't hurt. I'm trying it with a similar process as I write this, and it seems to work, though the example is wrong - it's too fast and was finished before I could check whether it's reporting progress or not.

FOPEN(m.lcFile,10) always reports -1. The file is being created by SQL Server - probably exclusive use.

If was only ever able to use FOPEN as a means of checking if the file had been completely created. Until we ran into what looked like a deadlock.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform