>
>That's a simple truth, you should see that:
>
>They were bought chemical weapons from a country which good at chemicals. Because your men cannot found any massive destructive weapon.
>
>Your country has a lot of and kind of mass destructive weapon and you can talk about these things. How can you do that?

Where did Iraq's chemical weapons go? Did they use every last one on the Iranians or the Kurds? The UN was unable to find out.

Maybe they dumped them in the desert. Maybe they sold them to other countries or militia. Nobody knows yet.

We have lots of nuclear and chemical weapons. We've used 2 in our history (a few days apart - they probably saved half a million lives by ending the war). We haven't used one in over 50 years. We've eliminated more of our own weapons than exist in the rest of the world (excluding Russia).

Do you think Iran (who vows to eliminate Israel) is building weapons to sit on for 50 years? Syria maybe (Israel just raided a nuclear weapons project)? North Korea (run by a psychopath who dwarf even Iran's leader)?

My bottom line is that Iraq did have and did use chemical weapons in combat, and never let the UN know what weapons remained. People who say Iraq had no chemical weapons are wrong.