Talk about thread drift
- we have "Foxpro nevr existed" where the politics of Iraq are being discussed
- and "My thoughts on recent politics" where Foxpro is being discussed

:-)

>Sorry Tracy, and why Irak can't have weapons but USA can?
>
>Luis Navas
>
>>Metin, regardless of whether or not Iraq had or hid or destroyed weapons just before 2003, it is well known that they actually manufactured their own chemical weapons and even had mobile units in the past. Iraq admitted this. They didn't purchase the weapons they used in the 80s, they manufactured them themselves.
>>

>>http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/new/documents/technical_documents/s-2006-701-munitions.pdf
>>https://www.cia.gov/library/reports/general-reports-1/iraqi_mobile_plants/index.html
>>http://www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/iraqi_mobile_plants/index.html
>>http://www.iraqwatch.org/profiles/chemical.html
>>
>>By the time UNSCOM left Iraq in December 1998, it had eliminated a large portion of Iraq's chemical weapon potential. UNSCOM had overseen the destruction or incapacitation of more than 88,000 filled or unfilled chemical munitions, over 600 tons of weaponized or bulk chemical agents, some 4,000 tons of precursor chemicals, some 980 pieces of key production equipment, and some 300 pieces of analytical equipment.
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes it's correct, like when Bush said that Irak had massive destructive weapons, it's in the same way!!!
>>>>
>>>>Correct. The tens of thousands of Iranian soldiers and Kurds that the UN says were killed by Iraqi chemical weapons in the mid to late 1980s (BTW 'Chemical Ali' got a death sentence from the Iraqis this week for that) actually died of bird flu.
>>>
>>>You're periodically saying same thing.
>>>
>>>That's a simple truth, you should see that:
>>>
>>>They were bought chemical weapons from a country which good at chemicals. Because your men cannot found any massive destructive weapon.
>>>
>>>Your country has a lot of and kind of mass destructive weapon and you can talk about these things. How can you do that?