It seems you want to argue over anything and everything. It also appears you can't follow a logical argument. Bill gave examples of propaganda. You and others accused that of being propaganda. If the act of pointing out when lies are used to blot out the truth is labeled as propaganda, then those people making that accusation would appear to be supporting the original lies.

If you say that the Bush administration used propaganda to gain support for the war in Iraq and I say your statement is propaganda, then wouldn't you think I was covering for the Bush administration and supporting their lies? I would think that. I actually wouldn't disagree with you if you said the Bush administration engaged in propaganda, but if I did, then it would be reasonable to assume that I was supporting Bush. Likewise, when Bill made his statement and you and others call it propaganda, then it's reasonable to assume that you are supporting the lies told by the Chinese government and the Iranian government.


>Russell, it seems you do not understand what propaganda is, even after Doru posted it's definition, you can read it again, I will provide you the link, I can not do much else Message #1261599.
>
>Now, think how many times You and William have asked us if we deny {Insert any of the unrelated to the thread comments that William used in his first post} to see how effective his propaganda was.