>Foxpro was not, VFP was.

Yes, I know. I did not interpret their reference as being to a version that was retired, what 10, 12, 14 years ago? I imagine they were talking - ignorantly - about Visual FoxPro. It's not as if the press (or even users) knows anything:

http://www.timesdaily.com/article/20070917/NEWS/70917012/1011