I agree with both your posts. While I am bemused my Mike's sense of self-grandiosity, which I associate with the young, and am not a fan of mental masturbation, he is a smart guy and worth paying attention to. Hopefully he will not find the group unwelcoming, even if we do roll our eyes sometimes.
>And also understand that as I mock the grandiosity of that one particular post, I still realize you're a very bright guy and I am watching the Youtube thing with great interest. Since I've always been interested in reality as a very subjective model limited by issues of scale ( the illusion of 'solidity' for example ) and other sensory limitations. I also am interested in the difference been apprehension and comprehension and so am suspicious of intellectually constructed models of 'reality'.
>
>I confess mathematics is a weakspot for me, but I do find mysticism in music theory. But again that is a sensory contruct and as such subjective and very dependant on both my personal hardware and software.
>
>I'll run the Youtube a few times and troll the other posts as I get time.
>
>( and remember, when I liken the ideas that push beyond the mundane to kicking open the Doors of Perception I don't do so to denigrate them. )
>
>>>
I've proposed radical thought experiments that have never been proposed. Ever.
>>>>
>>>>Unfortunately, as far as I'm aware, I am the only person in the world who understands my thought experiment.>>>
>>>Unless your tongue is jammed so far into your cheek it is making your ear hurt, *that* sounds like a chemical imbalance.
>>
>>
>>I've explained my idea several times.
>>
>>So far, no one has come forward and said "Yes, that makes total sense to me, I understand its implications."
>>
>>Here is the idea:
>>
>>It is possible, we could use apply mathematics to science in radically different ways.
>>
>>The following technique took me several years to develop:
>>
>>Instead of modeling reality directly with mathematics;
>>
>>We use mathematics to model a neural network;
>>
>>Then the neural network, directly models reality.
>>
>>
>>In other words, the idea is to use a neural network to build a model inside a model.
>>
>>A model inside a neural network inside a model.
>>
>>
>>To accomplish that would be a radical innovation.
>>
>>Think about such a model in the context of quantum mechanics or relativity.
>>
>>Here's more information:
>>
>>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pjPn5uhA0Q
