>I'm saying neither your radical thoughts "that have never been proposed. Ever." and your grandiose vision of yourself are not as unique as you seem to imagine.


You'd be surprised what I imagine.

I believe, that after contemplating QM for a week or two, I managed, with no previous knowledge, to recreate Leibniz's Monadology.

He believed that a system of 1s and 0s and consciousness would create a system of physics way better than Newton's.

That was the closest anyone in history has come to having my idea.

Of course, that was 400 years ago.

There was no such thing as a computer.

Then one was invented, using Leibniz's ideas.

Now I believe that Leibniz's vision for science will become true because of technology and neuroscience.

Of course, I've been talking to physicists and neuroscientists for years now.

They all admit that Leibniz doesn't make sense to them.

Maybe we're too deep in the church of Newton. I hope not.