>>>>>My scenario is trying to just display the facts as they are known, without being subjective to any party's point of view. I'm sure there could be mitigating circumstances. Did the employee sleep with the tattle-tale's wife? Did the employer already hate the employee? Did the tattle-tale fall on their head when they were a baby and permanently damage the maturity portion of their brain? All unknown, but given the facts, granted, as I know them, then I can only feel that the tattle-tale is blooming uncaring idiot.
>>>>
>>>>While respecting your opinion, I might have other opinion based on the facts you represented, and based on my life experience: fired employee is a liar and intentionally mislead you. And this opinion may be wrong as well.
>>>>
>>>>You see how those "facts" work? They do not!
>>>>
>>>>My point is, I understand your reaction, but I do not think that given facts allow us to make a decision.
>>>
>>>Sure they do. The facts "as I know them" allows me to make any decision I want. Can it change based on additional facts? Absolutely, but that doesn't stop me from having an opinion based on what I know at a given time. If you live your life waiting for "all" the facts, you will never move or make any decision.
>>
>>I agree with Yuri. There is a difference between (1) simply having insufficient facts, (2) having enough facts, and (3) waiting for all the facts. I think in your given scenario there are insufficient facts to make any decision either way.
>
>
>It's also unclear whether Jay has a decision to make, other than what he thinks of the situation.

Nope. Entirely objective. It's not about me at all. I should have worded it differently - that's my fault - but I was trying to see what black and white opinions there were. Ok, maybe some grey ones too, but falling one way or the other. If there were never any other facts, AK47 to your head, what decision would you make? That's rhetorical at this point because the initial purpose has been convoluted too much by now.