>>Agree,
>>But when I saw how the statement is created I assume that this is built with View designer, not with CA one :o)
>>Also there is no point what version of VFP is used so I am not sure at all if CAs are available there :-)
>
>In the original message of the very top: This is part of an application originally written in vfp5; it runs slower in vfp9.
>
>So, if CA is now an option, I may go for it in this case. I'm not sure we may be able to fight View limitations and gain a better speed with the original (or slightly optimized) view.

ROFL
One and the ONLY side effect here that you can't just USE View. But I totally agree with you.