Not at all. It is not justice if the wrong person serves the time for the wrong crime. I'm not sure justice requires that the perpetrator dies. I don't see one death for another death (especially if the original death was after intense suffering) justice. I would rather the perpetrator suffer (grievously) for the rest of their lives than had a peaceful death at the hands of the state.
>>I agree with this completely:
>>
>>>I've said it before, but I think it bears repeating. Regardless what sort of murder a person commits - really vicious, or just vicious (how could it not be at least vicious), the person should be allowed out of prison either: 1. When discovered to actually be innocent of the crime, or 2. When the person they killed returns to life (plus about 10 years for causing such a disruption in the recently reanimated corpse's daily routine).
>
>
>I think we're forgetting the victims of those vicious murders. Is justice done for them if their murders live?
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
