>>>>You may find it funny: on the russian foxpro forum this case was introduced about month ago, and in the very same manner using the very same facts. And you know what was the title? "Their habbits" ! Meaning, "can you believe, how ugly are people there in the western world"?
>>>>
>>>
>>>This makes me believe that I also know what this discussion is really about. If that's the case, then saying that the unethical behavior had nothing to do with the job in question is inaccurate.
>>
>>Can you not tell us about 'the case' you have in mind?
>>
>
>No, what I know came to me privately and I think it would be inappropriate for me to discuss the details here. But as I said, if it's the case I think it is, Jay's original description of the situation is misleading at best.

Really. Misleading? Doesn't change the facts of the assumption. Regardless of whether the employee's unethical behavior was indirectly related to their job, the Tattler had many other options than going to the employer. You can never convince me that the Tattler could have any justification in what they did. It seems fair to you? In that scenario things are in balance? Someone steps on your foot and you shoot them? Nice.