The exception is that one party has stopped behaving improperly (as far as I know) while the other party continues to due damage and make disparaging remarks ONLINE (as recently as last week) about the other party when he/she attempts to seek other employment (having been fired).

(Reworded for clarity)


>>>>Let's say that the behavior did affect the job. Just for argument's sake. So, you believe that that the actions of the tattle-tale in my scenario were justified? Getting someone fired to satisfy their own morbid sense of one-upmanship and power?
>>>
>>>I didn't say that. But the behavior in question occurred on the job on company time.
>>>
>>>Tamar
>>
>>And that's a reason for the Tattler to get the employee fired? You condone that action? Did the Tattler think about what that might mean to the life of the employee? How it might affect their family? You can't be that detatched and callous.
>
>I didn't say that. I simply said that the original scenario didn't present the facts correctly.
>
>FWIW, I don't think either party in this situation behaved well.
>
>Tamar