LOL.. You're a piece of work. Suspect? Add up the total number of times she's on during the days in question, then come to the same conclusion. She was spending more time on the thread than she was working; obviously her employer thought so also.

Why don't you stick to the topics at hand and quit nit-picking the periphery.


>... was suspect ...
>
>Are you a detective? FBI? CIA? How could I know you work 10 hours a day and be here only 20 times 3 minutes (adding up to one hour)? Would you take offense if I said that I think your behavior here is suspect?
>
>>Yes, I agree, but there is a fine line between posting during business hours and abusing the privilege. I often wondered how Naomi could answer question after question (sometimes within seconds of the posting) while being at work. I'm not excusing Kramek et. al. at all, but Naomi's behavior here was suspect also. I work about 10-12 hours per day, so even if I post an hour a day, they are still getting their money's worth.
>>
>>
>>>Agreed. But, those of us who post at work should let our managers know what we are doing and how much time we are using to do it. I have had three different managers where I work, all aware that I post during business hours. None have expressed concerns that it interferes with job duties.
>>>
>>>
>>>>The minute that our time is micromanaged to the point that we can't post gere dir fear of employer retribution is the minute this site, and those like it, go dark.
>>>>