Sorry MA. I know, MK must be MA.

>Really LOL. Although... thinking a little bit further about it. Suppose there's again some holy war here about the use of mdot. No, that one is settled now. But I recall that (correct me if the timeline is incorrect) some days before the letter was sent NN and MK had an argument on the MSDN forum. NN proposed someone a simple (one or two lines of code) solution, MK proposed a more complex solution (including a call to one of her home made UDFs), NN criticized that solution stating that it was overcomplex in light of the actual question, MK replied it wasn't and that it should also be regarded as a learning experience, the moderator jumped in telling NN that she shouldn't criticize someone else's solution and stick to technical issues, NN replied that it was exactly for that reason that she had criticized the overcomplex solution, etc.
>
>
>>While Naomi might not have used good judgement in her online time, it's clearly noone else's business. For someone to send in not 1, but 2 letters on it is absolutely dispicable behavior.
>>
>>What's next, are people going to critique other's code samples, and send in letters to their employers that questions their abilities because of their coding techniques?
>>
>>"Dear sir, I am an MVP. And we MVP's know that a good programmer would never use the techniques your employee is using!!!! "
>>
>>>It is and they will.
>>>
>>>>Your heart is in the right place. It's just that Naomi didn't want it made public, for a good reason. Oh well. It's done now and events will take their course.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>And your compassion has been overwhelming. But I'm sorry if I'm dredging up stuff.
>>>>>
>>>>>>I hadn't heard that she lost her job until in this thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Because most people didn't know then that Naomi got fired because of it. Did you? I just found out recently.
>>>>>>>