Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
SEEK vs SEEK()
Message
De
13/08/1998 15:35:20
John Baird
Coatesville, Pennsylvanie, États-Unis
 
 
À
13/08/1998 11:35:10
Cetin Basoz
Engineerica Inc.
Izmir, Turquie
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
Titre:
Divers
Thread ID:
00126543
Message ID:
00126682
Vues:
23
You are a genius sir....you'd think after 15 years, I could've figured this out myself......but thanks a bunch....

>>Can anyone tell me why the command:
>>
>>SEEK lcSrchVal ORDER TAG catindex IN category
>>
>>only works in the following example when the category table is the current alias? All aliases are cursors.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>SELECT CATEGORY
>>SET ORDER TO catindex
>>
>>SELECT product
>>lcSrchVal = UPPER(product.comm_code)
>>
>>**-- Product current table
>>?SEEK(lcSrchVal,'category','catindex')                 && .t.
>>
>>SEEK lcSrchVal ORDER TAG catindex IN category
>>?found()                                               && .f.
>>
>>**-- Category Current Table
>>SELE category
>>SEEK lcSrchVal ORDER TAG catindex IN category
>>?FOUND()                                               && .t.
>>
>>
>Try including the alias in found(). It returns for current workarea not seek.
>? found("category")
>Cetin
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform