You are ccoerrt, some jemulbs are mroe diufciflt to raed than otrhes. If you wnat to paly anruod with tihs you can daolownd my "JumbleTron" pargorm form my wetsibe at
http://www.ita-software.com/foxpage.aspx. It's a Vuisal FoPrxo cslas that wlil jmbule the leetrts in ecah word in a stinrg.
>...The jumbling is done by a native (you act as one at the moment :), so he doesn't jumble this properly. Try "irnomeptt" instead of "iprmoetnt" (i.e. break the "nt" group which is too common), "urientisvy" instead of "uinervtisy", "rhesreccah" instead of "rscheearch" (break the ch!), "iglennelitt" instead of "itelnliegnt" (break the nt!) and all the supposed "it doesn't matter in which order the characters are" goes out the window. OK, not quite, because the words in English are so short on the average that too many of them are still recognizable no matter which permutation of the inner characters you apply.
Rick Borup, MCSD
recursion (rE-kur'-shun) n.
see recursion.