>>>>>I wouldn't waste anymore time on the matter.
>>>>
>>>>As to my knowledge Naomi is still unemployed at home.
>>>>
>>>>BTW, why do you use the word 'waste'?
>>>
>>>Ok well I jumped in quite late on this, so let me make sure I understand what's happened.
>>>Naomi spent a bunch of time on a coupla fourms while at work and she got in trouble for it because someone told her boss...is that basicly what's happened here?
>>
>>Sounds a gross over-simplification to me.
>>
>>I understand that the very root of the issue was Naomi's using a direct link to a UT thread in an answer on a forum that AndyK either owns or has strong influence.
>>Seemed that direct links to elsewhere were fine, but not to the UT.
>>
>>From that little snowflake of a problem an avalanche ensued.
>
>
>Sooo...Naomi posted a link somewhere and the end result is a letter to her boss? Well that's ridicilious, but hey if you screw around on the internet all day at the office and get canned for it, no one to blame but yourself no matter how it comes to light.
Sorry guys, but you are now both over-simplifying things. Details that matter have not been mentioned. So, please be careful with judgments.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
