>>>>>>I wouldn't waste anymore time on the matter.
>>>>>
>>>>>As to my knowledge Naomi is still unemployed at home.
>>>>>
>>>>>BTW, why do you use the word 'waste'?
>>>>
>>>>Ok well I jumped in quite late on this, so let me make sure I understand what's happened.
>>>>Naomi spent a bunch of time on a coupla fourms while at work and she got in trouble for it because someone told her boss...is that basicly what's happened here?
>>>
>>>Sounds a gross over-simplification to me.
>>>
>>>I understand that the very root of the issue was Naomi's using a direct link to a UT thread in an answer on a forum that AndyK either owns or has strong influence.
>>>Seemed that direct links to elsewhere were fine, but not to the UT.
>>>
>>>From that little snowflake of a problem an avalanche ensued.
>>
>>
>>Sooo...Naomi posted a link somewhere and the end result is a letter to her boss? Well that's ridicilious, but hey if you screw around on the internet all day at the office and get canned for it, no one to blame but yourself no matter how it comes to light.
>
>I disagree somewhat. My main issue is that there was no need for someone to send a letter to her employer. This is what resulted in her getting fired. No letter, she (likely) still has her job.

That might be true, but if she would of been doing her job and not been screwing around on the internet all day she (likely) would still have her job - plus such of letter couldn't of been sent in the first place.