>>>
>>>I understand that the very root of the issue was Naomi's using a direct link to a UT thread in an answer on a forum that AndyK either owns or has strong influence.
>>>Seemed that direct links to elsewhere were fine, but not to the UT.
>>>
>>>From that little snowflake of a problem an avalanche ensued.
>>
>>Jim,
>>
>>That is my impression too.
>>
>>Don't have any links to foxite as I'm not using it
>>But for msdn - see here
>>http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1552798&SiteID=1
>>and here http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1617290&SiteID=1
>
>"Please do NOT refer to "for-profit" sites - like the Universal Thread - in replies on this forum."... says he on a Microsoft-run forum. Microsoft is obviously a well known non-profit.

Now, that, Dragan, is a good one !

I recall a (non-technical) course I was on - more than 10 years ago.

The person giving the course said: Amazing what Mircosoft has achieved. They sell products and when you have trouble with them, ask your uncle or your neighbour for support ...

And so Bill created the newsgroups/forums and saith: let there be both 'for-profit' sites and 'profit' sites ...