I have not seen anything that Naomi has posted that could be seen as offensive or negative. However, she has been bullheaded in posting comments on several forums after she has been asked to stop, several times.

If you are looking for something truly shocking in what she posted, I don't think you'll find what you are looking for. But she has gone out of her way to antagonize some people.

Once again, this does not excuse AK or MA's behavior. But Naomi is clearly not 100% innocent in this case.



>>>>Maria is correct in her quoting of Dan Freeman, that one of the marks of a good MVP is being able to answer not only the current question, but the next two or three that might follow - and I'll add to that, without being irritating.
>>>>
>>>>(And in fairness, some of Naomi's words in these posts are anything but 'taking the high road' either).
>>>
>>>Had to lookup "taking the high road" on the internet and I now presume that you think negative about some words used by Naomi in these posts. So I took the time to reread the posts (as mentioned above) one more time. My personal conclusion: Not a single word, not a single thought she expresses there is offensive or negative. What was it that made you come to your conclusion?
>>
>>That's the problem with her posts sometimes - there's nothing offensive, but then the choice of words may still get the recipient in a very bad mood. Something quite hard to catch sometimes, and equally hard to imagine a bad intent behind it, but still easy to imagine the reader being rather annoyed with it.
>
>This may well be true, and it may also apply to my own texts, but how about the posts referred to here? Who can explain to me what words were in these posts that are anything but 'taking the high road'??
>
>>Come to think of it, it should be considered an art - it's an effect that isn't simple to achieve intentionally. It's a sort of negative diplomacy.