>>>>>>I'm still waiting for the referral to the words she used there. Not saying here that YOU should give the reference.
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1617290&SiteID=1>>>>>Nadya's 1st reply: details - see Marcia's reply
>>>>
>>>>One might argue that Naomi's words there are not entirely high school English, but they are definitely not offensive or insinuative in my eyes. OTOH, Marcia's reaction was disproportionately negative.
>>>
>>>Peter,
>>>
>>>I've seen it happen more than once.
>>>
>>>Nadya's answer may be interpreted as: Mr K was not impartial
>>
>>Naomi expressed her opinion that Andy indeed hadn't been neutral. It would have been odd if she'd said something otherwise. (BTW, this reminds me of the discussion about being 'politically correct'.)
>>
>>>Oh, and why do you think that Nadya has that sentence in small letters in her signature - coincidence ?
>>
>>Hmm, perhaps she should replace that one with this one: If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual alternative explanation of my message.
>
>Hear hear!
Terry, is my signature now okay? Dragan pointed out that I wrongly used the word 'eventual'. I have replaced it by ' possible'. No ambiguity anymore?
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
