Whatever happens won't change this. Perhaps those two are marked for life. They'll be recognized as the ones who did that BAD BAD thing. I just wish that wherever they go from now on somebody will remind them of what they did. For example "Hi I'm Denis. What's your name? ANDY KRAMEK! Are you the Andy Kramek that did that disgusting thing..."


>>I'm wondering (in fact I'd like to know) if MS heard about this and how they feel about their DISTINGUISHED MVPs. If they did'nt perhaps they should know about this.
>
>It's a tight community and the a-holes clearly were happy to share their letters with other MVPs. It's my guess that MS has heard about this. But I don't think they (MS) should do anything. Other than to remember it when MVP renewals are up for consideration.
>
>
>>
>>Good to hear about your health.
>>
>>
>>>>>Frankly, too, I think Naomi should have contacted a lawyer by now.
>>>>
>>>>Hmm interesting point here. But what would be the main arguments for Naomi?
>>>>
>>>>Another thing. Laws in the U.S.A. and in Canada could be very different in a case like that.
>>>>
>>>>Oh and by the way how's your health Jim?
>>>
>>>I agree that laws are different. But I can see a U.S. lawyer finding several arguments.
>>>- None of their business. Forum participation <> co-worker issues;
>>>- Phoney argument regarding 'protecting taxpayer value'. A state agency (or municipal?) and not even in the same state as the letter writers;
>>>- Malicious intent with no shred of justification.
>>>
>>>I interpret AndyK's "departure" as moderator on a MSDN forum as some "proof" that his original argument was totally without merit. And what transpired after that shows far more bull-headedness than ever has been displayed by Naomi.
>>>
>>>It's a slow process regaining my health, but it is steadily going upward as a trend.
>>>
>>>cheers