I can see your point of view. But in thinking about it, it is really up to MS to do something about it. Besides it carrying far more weight, it would provide more publicity. Which would cause the punishment to go far futher then a couple posts on the UT condemning the act ever could.


>In my opinion, that is the only reason the 'MVP' status has any relevance in this situation. It was included in the signature block of the letter and hence gave the letter more 'weight' and that action alone causes the actions of the letter writer to reflect on Microsoft and all other MVPs, like it or not.
>
>
>>>I don't see that the opinions of MVPs are any or more less valid than anyone else's on this issue.
>>
>>Only inasmuch as a "Microsoft MVP" was a part of the signature under a certain letter to employer. Maybe some MVPs don't mind being somehow associated with it, maybe some do.