>>And I think she knows enough and is very willing to share that knowledge.
>
>Read message# 1268321
>
>>Depends. It depends on the motives of that 'someone'. But here's one for you: The woman got raped in that park at midnight. Who's at fault?
>
>Both are at fault.
>
>She hacked in to another site using Andy's credentials. That is like robbing the "rapist" with a gun before the rape ever occurred.

Your simplistic anology not withstanding, the two actaul acts are hardly comparable. She lost her job because of the letters, which was the intent of them, I'm sure. How can you equate them?